Thursday, 3 April 2025
On Threshold Problems for Orbits of Semigroup Actions by Eike
Thursday, 20 March 2025
Giorgio Genovesi on Characterizing Regular Countable Second Countable Spaces in Second Order Arithmetic
Title: Characterizing Regular Countable Second Countable Spaces in Second Order Arithmetic
Thursday, 23 January 2025
Hideki Tsuiki visiting Swansea
Tuesday, 14 January 2025
Elvira Mayordomo visiting Swansea
Elvira Mayordomo is visiting us this week. Today she gave a talk as a part of our seminar series.
Title: On information theory in geometric measure theory
Tuesday, 10 December 2024
Oliver Kullmann's talk
Today Oliver Kullmann will give a talk on Automated search for special Latin squares as a part of our Seminar series.
Abstract:
Latin squares have been studied since the days of Euler. After some overview on the history and background, an effort for a complete enumeration of special types of Latin squares of order 13, by as completely automated means as possible (which is currently actually not possible), will be presented and evaluated. The main method here is Cube-and-Conquer, a kind of 2-stage SAT-solving (as invented by the presenter). Quite some fine-tuning of representation and choice of solver was needed, and will be discussed (at some high level)
Thursday, 28 November 2024
Matteo Acclavio visiting Swansea
Next week's theory seminar will be given by Matteo Acclavio from the University of Sussex, who is visiting us for a few days. The topic will be a new logical framework for concurrent programs, abstract below.
Title: A new logical framework for concurrent programs
Abstract:
Designing logical frameworks to reason about the properties of concurrent programs while accurately capturing the essence of concurrency is a challenging task.
The main difficulties can be traced back to the syntactic constraints of the languages used for this purpose.
In particular, I will show you a non-commutative logic where we can interpret proofs as computation trees for the pi-calculus, and use proof nets to provide canonical representations of these trees modulo interleaving concurrency.
This work is based on joint works with Giulia Manara and Fabrizio Montesi
Tuesday, 19 November 2024
Next week's Theory Seminar Series
Next week Troy will give a talk on Conceptualising Programming Language Semantics as a part of our seminar series.
Abstract:
Research on the semantics of programming language has tended towards formalisation. Following the successful deployment and myriad uses of formal syntax, many of those working on semantics assumed similar successes would be realised with formal semantics.
The reality was different, and the resultant language specifications were large, complicated, technical artefacts. My previous historical research has studied those from a technical perspective.
In this talk, I will explore the conceptual surroundings of the semantics, examining the use of metaphors, analogies, and illustrative language used to accompany or explain the formal documents.
It is early stage research and will focus primarily on picking examples from the history of semantics for deeper analysis in the future.
I will also present some philosophical frameworks I am considering for use in this analysis and begin to discuss how they might help us understand the topic.
This research will ultimately lead to a conference presentation and journal article next year, as well as forming a pilot study for a research grant proposal.
Tuesday, 29 October 2024
An introduction to effective fractal dimension by Benjamin Koch
Today's theory seminar will be given by Benjamin Koch, who will give as an introduction to effective fractal dimension.
Abstract:
Monday, 21 October 2024
Theory Seminar Series
Abstract:
A wide range of problems from a diverse range of areas can be formulated as "escape problems": does a given point escape a set under the iteration of a function, or do all points in a given set escape the set under the function.
The decidability of these problems is almost exclusively studied under the assumption that points, functions, and sets are specified exactly by a finite amount of data (e.g. rational or algebraic parameters). In this setting, positive results are largely limited to linear systems, since already very simple non-linear systems can have undecidable escape problems.
When working with systems that involve real data, say, coming from scientific or engineering applications, the assumption that the system be known to infinite precision is arguably unrealistic. One should rather assume that the system is known only up to finite precision. In that case, the natural question becomes whether the system's behaviour -- escaping or not escaping -- is robust under all sufficiently small perturbations. On the one hand, this requires us in some sense to do more than to decide the problem for a single given point at a time. On the other hand, there appears to be little value in determining the status of problem instances that lie on a "decision boundary", i.e. instances that are not robust under small perturbation. The latter point is interesting in light of the aforementioned undecidability results in the discrete-data setting, which appear to rely on the existence of very difficult non-robust instances.
The aim of this talk is to demonstrate by means of a case study that computable analysis constitutes an excellent framework for the discussion of robust decidability questions, such as the above. I will study to escape problems for very general non-linear systems and show at least in one case that the problem becomes as close to decidable as one can hope it to be in this setting. The Point Escape Problem is to decide for a given continuous map f, a given closed set A, and a given point x in A whether x escapes A under iteration of f. The Set Escape Problem is to decide for a given continuous map f and a given compact set K whether all points of K escape K under iteration of f. I will give a complete algorithm for the Point Escape Problem and a potentially not complete algorithm for the Set Escape Problem. I will show that both algorithms terminate generically, and discuss some concrete examples of termination problems.
Thursday, 12 September 2024
Research visit
Thursday, 18 April 2024
Máté Szabó's talk
Gödel's and Post's Proofs of the Incompleteness Theorem
This talk examines and compares two strikingly different proofs of the first incompleteness theorem. The first proof of the theorem was famously published by Kurt Gödel in 1931. However, during the previous decade, Emil Post already made significant breakthroughs in this topic, even though he was unable to publish his work for various reasons. After taking a short look at Gödel's diagonal proof, we will engage in more detail with Post's lesser-known proof. The latter proof is purely syntactic, and computer scientists of the day could recognize Post's approach as presenting one of the earliest term rewrite systems. By the end of the talk the audience will hopefully agree with Post stating that “with the Principia Mathematica as a common starting point [i.e. of Gödel and Post], the roads followed towards our common conclusions are so different that much may be gained from a comparison of these parallel evolutions”.
Thursday, 22 February 2024
Pieter Collins visiting
We are at the 41st British Colloquium for Theoretical Computer Science at Strathclyde University (Glasgow)
BCTCS 2025 at Strathclyde University, Glasgow Marek Jezinski, Alec Critten, Harry Bryant and Olga Petrovska are currently attending the 41st...

-
Our Theory Research Group kicked off the year with an inspiring away day, providing the perfect opportunity to reconnect as a team after the...
-
Professor Hideki Tsuiki from Kyoto University is visiting Swansea University from 22nd to 24th of January. Yesterday, he gave a talk on Coin...